web analytics
Skip to content

The legal threats and demands from Baker & McKenzie in relation to this site

Sadly, there has been a litany of threats and intimidation emanating from within the Law Society of NSW, which has seen letters threatening court action, an army colleague of the then president of the Law Society making a clandestine visit to my employer’s office with the directive that my employment be terminated, and even two detectives turning up on my front door due to my writing to the Legal Services Commissioner regarding his own concealing of criminality.

The latest act of intimidation is another letter from Baker & McKenzie, advising that the statements on this site are ‘false, malicious, and highly defamatory‘, and that they had been instructed to commence proceedings and seek urgent interlocutory orders.  As can be seen below, a letter was written to Baker & McKenzie advising of their non-compliance with the Defamation Act 2005, and also advising of the corrupt nature of their clients.  Predictably, everyone has fallen silent.

See below the letters from Baker & McKenzie bearing their wild threats (while non-legally compliant), and the responses highlighting further corrupt activity, including within that firm.

Anthony Foley

National Managing Partner

Anthony Foley who has overseen the intimidatory tactics in relation to the Law Society cover up and this website.

Andrew Stewart the author of four letters issuing various threats and demands in order to harrass and bring about silence.

Paul Forbes who also issued threats as far back as February 2017 in an attempt to cover up corrupt conduct at the Law Society.





Friday, 3rd December 2021


Mr Andrew Stewart
Partner
Baker & McKenzie
Tower One – International Towers Sydney
Level 46, 100 Barangaroo Avenue
Barangaroo   NSW   2000


Dear Mr Stewart

Re:  Law Society of NSW and Ms Juliana Warner

I refer to the above and to your letter to me of yesterday.

As you know, I this morning forwarded six E-mails to you, which were originally sent to Paul Forbes of your firm between 1st December and 2nd December 2021, being quite obviously yesterday and the day before.

You will indeed have had time to digest the contents of those E-mails, and more importantly, the attachments to all six of the communications as sent to you.  At present, the E-mail as sent at 10.23am has been read six times, the E-mail sent at 10.30am has been read three times, the E-mail of 10.33am six times, the E-mail of 10.41am three times, the E-mail of 10.54am three times, and the E-mail of 10.58am has been read six times.

Given your due attention to the said E-mails, you will now see quite clearly that every single claim that I have made has been not only substantially true, but has been entirely accurate.  If such claims had not been true, I would not have written them.

In your letter to me of yesterday, you stated that my claims were false, defamatory, and malicious.  Now that you have had time to read all the information as sent to you, can you please set out clearly and plainly any false claim made on my part.

I look forward to your response.

Yours faithfully

Click here for original pdf version of the above letter.





Tuesday, 7th December 2021


Mr Andrew Stewart
Partner
Baker & McKenzie
Tower One – International Towers Sydney
Level 46, 100 Barangaroo Avenue
Barangaroo   NSW   2000


Dear Mr Stewart

Re:  Law Society of NSW and Ms Juliana Warner

I refer to the above, and write as an addendum to the further particulars notice as sent to you on 3rd December 2021 (by E-mail at 3.58pm).

In your letter of 2nd December 2021, you make the claim that I have harassed current and former employees of the Law Society of NSW.  I deny this allegation as made by both yourself and your clients.

Can you please, at your earliest convenience, provide the evidence you have to hand to substantiate your claim that I have harassed current and former employees of the Law Society of NSW, as such was not included in your letter*.

In relation to any harassment that has in fact taken place, I refer you specifically to my letter to your client, Juliana Warner, of 12th November 2021.  As can be seen, it is not your clients who have been harassed.

I look forward to your response.

Yours faithfully

* Letter of 2nd December 2021 was devoid of any attachment, and no evidence supplied for any claim.

Click here for original pdf version of the above letter.





Tuesday, 7th December 2021


Mr Andrew Stewart
Partner
Baker & McKenzie
Tower One – International Towers Sydney
Level 46, 100 Barangaroo Avenue
Barangaroo NSW 2000


Dear Mr Stewart

Re: Law Society of NSW and Ms Juliana Warner

I refer once more to the above.

In your letter of 2nd December 2021, you state that claims as made by me are ‘false, malicious and highly defamatory’. As we have seen, all claims as made by myself in relation to your clients’ conduct are factual and sound.

Your allegations against me were made while you had no evidence or documentation to hand. It is obvious that you accepted hearsay evidence when issuing legal threats, while also stating that you had received instructions to commence urgent Court proceedings against me without any further notice to myself.

Additionally, you claim that my ‘highly defamatory’ statements give rise to a large number of imputations. Given that my statements are indeed true and accurate, it therefore follows that the imputations you claim arise are true also.

Do you wish to provide comment?

Yours faithfully

Click here for original pdf version of the above letter.





Wednesday, 8th December 2021


Mr Andrew Stewart
Partner
Baker & McKenzie
Tower One – International Towers Sydney
Level 46, 100 Barangaroo Avenue
Barangaroo   NSW   2000


Dear Mr Stewart

Re: Law Society of NSW and Ms Juliana Warner

What I have learned from this entire debacle is that Baker & McKenzie is willing to protect those carrying out corrupt acts, and, quite obviously, is accepting payment to do so.

It is little wonder you remain silent.

Yours faithfully

Click here for original pdf version of the above letter.





Tuesday, 21st December 2021


Mr Andrew Stewart
Partner
Baker & McKenzie
Tower One – International Towers Sydney
Level 46, 100 Barangaroo Avenue
Barangaroo   NSW   2000


Dear Mr Stewart

Re: Law Society of NSW and Ms Juliana Warner

Having had a little more time to digest the contents of your letter to me of yesterday, all I can say is that your behaviour is deeply unprofessional, if not utterly scurrilous.

As in your letter of 2nd December 2021, you once again claim that I have defamed your clients (among others), however, you refuse to particularise or explain any part of those allegations. In your letter of yesterday, you go further and state that I have also been misleading and deceptive in my actions, yet, and again, you offer no real explanation for these claims. Your allegations are untrue and are offensive, and you write such knowing same to be false.

In the opening paragraphs of your letter, you suggest, and without the merest hint of irony, that I bring the conduct of Terence Goldberg to the attention of the Office of the Legal Services Commissioner and also to the NSW Police. You make this statement in the full knowledge that I already did so, with the Law Society ultimately dismissing all complaints as made against Mr Goldberg, while providing false statements in doing so.

You are also aware that the NSW Police informed me that the Law Society of NSW declined to cooperate during the investigation into Terence Goldberg’s activities (in a meeting with the NSW Police on 19th October 2015), and you are aware also of John McKenzie having provided false statements to the NSW Police during that same investigation.

You and your firm have been provided with all Court documentation which confirms that Terence Goldberg acted for four plaintiffs in Supreme Court proceedings, with Terence Goldberg then going on to provide false statements to the Court to seek his costs from a party for whom he did not act (the sixth defendant in the matter, and therefore being an opposing party), before entering into a conspiracy to commit further fraud and also into a money laundering scheme with moneys as fraudulently obtained in the first instance.

Despite you being fully cognisant of both the criminality involved and the cover up that is taking place, you state that your clients, being the Law Society of NSW and the president of such, will not respond to any further correspondence on the matter. Both you and your clients are making a distinct mockery of the law and its processes.

In your letter of 2nd December 2021, you speak of the duties of the President of the Law Society of NSW and of the Law Society itself, however, it appears you are now stating that no such duties actually exist. You would be aware that your statements are contradictory, if not fully dichotomous in their content.

You go on to claim in your letter of yesterday that the redirection of a URL to a website which highlights Terence Goldberg’s criminal conduct is likely to mislead or deceive consumers seeking the services of Turner Freeman, and may be a breach of Australian Consumer Law. Quite frankly, I have never before heard anything so ridiculous.

Also in your letter of yesterday, you go on to make the same threat as you made in your previous letter, in that your clients will commence proceedings against me without further notice to myself, and yet you do not state or particularise the actual grounds for so doing.

As previously requested of you now on numerous occasions, please provide to me without any further delay the particulars of any untrue statement as made by myself, or indeed where I have made any defamatory statement or any statement on my part with an intent to mislead or deceive, or in fact where I have broken any Australian law. You have made your claims, and you need to substantiate your claims. You are a legal professional, after all.

In truth, your seeking the removal of the content of a website is not only because it is embarrassing to your clients, but because such also draws attention to the conduct of Baker & McKenzie, who has along with the Law Society attempted to cover up the criminal conduct of Terence Goldberg and also attempted to harass a member of the public for bringing such to the attention of a wider audience.

Perhaps also I need to remind you that first and foremost your duty to any client is secondary to your duty to the Court, and you are indeed alert to the fact that the Honourable Court has been misled for the purposes of improper financial gain.

Your conduct is unethical to say the least, and it appears you have lost your moral compass as well as having thrown off the shackles of your professional obligations.

Yours faithfully

Click here for original pdf version of the above letter.





Saturday, 8th January 2022


Mr Andrew Stewart
Partner
Baker & McKenzie
Tower One – International Towers Sydney
Level 46, 100 Barangaroo Avenue
Barangaroo   NSW   2000


Dear Mr Stewart

Re: Law Society of NSW and Ms Juliana Warner

I refer to your letter of 24th December 2021, being a purported concerns notice. As you are aware, I responded to your letter that same day with a further particulars notice, as defined under section 12A(3) of the Defamation Act 2005 (NSW).

Given your failure to respond to such, such concerns notice is now taken as not having been given (as provided for under section 12A(5) of the said Act).

On re-reading your letters of 2nd December, 20th December, and 24th December 2021, it is of note that despite your repeated rhetoric and claims of the defamation of your clients, you have not once provided any instance or particulars as to where that alleged defamation has occurred; and indeed despite the several requests for you to do so.

It is somewhat concerning that given all the evidence as placed before you of the improper conduct of your client(s) (including Court documentation) you continue to write to me demanding my silence on the matter.

Your attempting to conceal the improper conduct of your clients, as well as the criminal activities of other legal professionals associated with the matter, could not be any more obvious.

Your conduct, as well as that of your clients, is not acceptable, and I refer you to section 316 of the Crimes Act 1900 (NSW).

Yours faithfully

Click here for original pdf version of the above letter.





Friday, 25th February 2022


Mr Andrew Stewart
Partner
Baker & McKenzie
Tower One – International Towers Sydney
Level 46, 100 Barangaroo Avenue
Barangaroo   NSW   2000


Dear Mr Stewart

Re:  Law Society of NSW and Ms Juliana Warner

I refer to your letter of even date (copy attached).  I also refer to your previous letters of 2nd December 2021, 20th December 2021, and 24th December 2021.

This letter will serve as a further particulars notice as defined under section 12A(3) of the Defamation Act 2005 (NSW).

As in your previous letters to me, you allege that I have made defamatory statements about your clients (being the Law Society of NSW and Ms Juliana Warner), and I seek from you the particulars of any alleged defamatory statement as made by myself.

This is your fourth letter to me alleging defamation, with each and every one of your letters being devoid of any example or particularisation of such.  Despite my several and repeated requests from you for particulars of any such defamation, you continually refuse to respond.

Again, I request that you provide to me particulars of any false, misleading, or defamatory statement I have made about either of your clients, and I also request that you provide to me the basis of any Court proceedings your clients may commence against me.

It is of note that I have had cause to write to Mr Milton Cheng, Global Chair of your firm, on numerous occasions regarding your conduct and the conduct of the Baker McKenzie Sydney office.  As such, Mr Cheng will receive a copy of this letter.

Yours faithfully

Click here for original pdf version of the above letter.




From:  Symn Waters

Date:  Fri, 27 May 2022 at 09:11

Subject:  Quora and the non-achievement thereof – criminal conduct

To:   [email protected]com
Cc:  [email protected]nsw.gov.au
[email protected]m
[email protected]com
[email protected]
[email protected]
[email protected]
[email protected]


Dear Mr Stewart

As you know, I wrote to you yesterday regarding a fabricated committee meeting and the non-achievement of any quorum in relation to such.

On the same topic of quora, find attached copy of minutes of another non-quorate meeting, ie the ‘meeting of creditors‘ as supposedly took place in the offices of Jones Partners on 29 May 2014.  As you well know, Terence Goldberg was the only attendee at this ‘meeting of creditors‘, and despite the stipulation of Regulation 5.6.16(2) of the Corporations Regulations deeming such meeting to be null and void, Jones Partners claimed the ‘meeting’ to be true and valid, which, of course, it was not.

Now, and again as you well know, Turner Freeman Lawyers was paid in full of its supposed debt (against a party for whom they did not act) on 20 December 2012.  So, in effect, Terence Goldberg of Turner Freeman Lawyers attended an invalid meeting of creditors while not being a creditor, and was the only actual attendee at such.
 
And again as you well know, Terence Goldberg discussed the creation of two new entities at that meeting, which, in turn, were used to capture all remaining funds as belonging to the same party for whom Turner Freeman did not act, and where some of those funds remain to this day some 11 years after the sale of that entity’s only asset, being the property of 2 London Street, Enmore, which, again as you know, realised the sum of $965,000.
 
Now, forgive me if I am repeating myself somewhat by providing the same information to you as you have received before, however, I am just merely following your example.  Indeed, you wrote to me on four separate occasions while repeating yourself also.  However, I would have to say that our motives are somewhat in opposition.  I am attempting to bring to light the wrongdoing that is taking place, whereas you, on the other hand, and indeed a legal professional and an officer of the Court, are working to protect the wrongdoers in the matter.
 
We are in a bind, are we not?  Your conduct is more than worthy of a complaint to our legal regulators, however, how can I make a complaint regarding your conduct when you are in turn protecting those regulators and their covering up of the fraudulent activities as repeatedly brought to their and your attention?  Quite ironically (albeit in a roundabout fashion), you identify the issues at hand in your letter of 2 December 2021.
 
Further, in your letter to me which you saw fit to send to me at 6.42pm on Christmas Eve, you speak of the Court and other legal documents that I previously provided to you as mere assertions on my part.  May I ask if you are suggesting that I have somehow manipulated or misrepresented any of same?
 
For the reference of those copied into this E-mail I attach copy of letter to you of 21 December 2021 regarding your conduct.
 




From:  Symn Waters

Date:  Monday, 6 June 2022 8:47 AM

Subject:  The covering up of criminal conduct within the legal profession

To:   [email protected]com
Cc:  [email protected]m
[email protected]com
[email protected]
[email protected]
[email protected]
[email protected]


Dear Mr Stewart

You have provided neither comment nor response to my E-mail to you of 27 May 2022 (as below), which deals with the covering up of wrongdoing as taking place within the Law Society of NSW and indeed specific criminal conduct within the legal profession itself.

For the reference of those to whom this E-mail is copied, I attach your four separate letters to me of 2 December 2021, 20 December 2021, 24 December 2021, and 25 February 2022, in the very form such were received.
 
Rather than deal with each letter individually, let us look at the total of such, with you invariably alleging that claims as made by myself are ‘false, highly defamatory, seriously defamatory, and malicious‘, while also alleging that I have defamed your clients.  In the main, such relates to my letters to Ms Juliana Warner, then President of the Law Society of NSW, of 12 November 2021, 18 November 2021, and 19 November 2021, and the publication of same on the internet.  As you are aware, those letters to Ms Warner raised issues of the covering up of solicitor misconduct by both the Law Society of NSW and the Office of the Legal Services Commissioner, with Ms Warner refusing to respond to such.
 
However, and as we can see in your correspondences, you have not once provided any evidence or example of any false claim as made by myself, nor indeed do you provide one instance or particular of where I have ‘defamed’ your clients, other than to repeat your allegations in somewhat of a mantra-like fashion.  As stated in my letters to you of 21 December 2021 and 8 January 2022 regarding your own unprofessional conduct, you remain unable to provide any example of false or misleading statement as made by myself, despite my many and repeated requests for you to do so.
 
We need to pay particular attention to your last letter to me (of 25 February 2022) as on 31 December 2021 the landscape changed quite markedly in respect to the position of your clients.  In your first letter to me, you state that you act for Juliana Warner in her capacity as President of the Law Society of NSW as well as for the Law Society itself.  Given Ms Warner’s departure as President from the Law Society of NSW on 31 December 2021, we need to understand who within the Law Society of NSW provided instructions to you or your firm to issue your last letter to me.  Somebody within the Law Society of NSW must have done so given your written proclamation that you continue to act for it.
 
Of course, the above presents quite a problem, and I refer to your letter of 2 December 2021.  In such, you claim that my ‘false’ statements give rise to several imputations, including that of corrupt activity as taking place with the Law Society of NSW.  Now, and as you have witnessed, every statement as made by myself has been entirely factual and correct, and you yourself (somewhat unwisely) have provided a distinct label for the behaviours as exhibited by your clients.
 
And now, equally, we have two or more problems.  Given I provided to you irrefutable evidence of the truth of all or any statement as made by myself, and indeed did so immediately after your first letter to me, your subsequent letters to me are clearly nefarious in nature and were sent with the direct intention to harass and intimidate and in an attempt to bring about my silence.  Given also your ongoing claim that you act for the Law Society of NSW and for Ms Juliana Warner, it goes without saying that your clients provided instructions for you to carry out such.
 
As you are quite aware, I sent to Baker McKenzie on 14 March 2022 an affidavit as sworn by myself on 12 March 2022.  You are familiar with the contents of such affidavit as the exhibits of same were provided to you on several, if not innumerable occasions, prior to your second letter to me, with such documents providing direct evidence of not only the criminal conduct of Terence Goldberg of Turner Freeman Lawyers, but also of Mr Goldberg’s abuse of the Court to make fraudulent financial gain.  Indeed, you make mention of the criminal conduct of Terence Goldberg in your first letter to me (and also of the cover up thereof), and despite me subsequently reminding you of your legal and lawful obligations, you and your clients continue to turn your collective heads in the opposite direction, and breaching statute in so doing.
 
It is clear from the above that both you and your clients have deliberately gone out of your way to cover up acts of serious criminality as taking place within the legal profession.  Your firm’s conduct and the conduct of your clients is not acceptable.  At this juncture I attach copy of letter sent directly to your client, Ms Juliana Warner, of 14 February 2022.  Such relates directly to all the above and is self-explanatory.
 
I again refer you and your clients to section 316 of the Crimes Act 1900 (NSW).
 
Yours faithfully
 



From:  Symn Waters

Date:  Tuesday, 12 July 2022 2:57 PM

Subject:  The Law Society of NSW


 

Dear Mr Forbes

I refer to your letter of even date, as received a few moments ago (as attached).

You again make claims of harassment, and once again you fail to provide evidence of any harassment on my part.  Such follows the usual pattern of your firm’s conduct.  As you well know, I have remained calm and factual at all times, and I have never once either muttered a cross word or told a single untruth.  You and your firm have been provided on several occasions documentary evidence of criminal conduct within the legal profession, and the cover up thereof, and you and your firm, like your client, have turned your collective heads in the opposite direction.

Blocking my E-mails, as you state your firm and your client is going to do, is not going to make the problem of covering up solicitor misconduct go away.  It is simply a methodology of preventing the truth being told, and indeed also your firm’s part in what is taking place.

Quite honestly, I expect nothing else of you.

Yours faithfully



From:  Symn Waters

Date:  Tuesday, 12 July 2022 5:24 PM

Subject:  The Law Society of NSW


 

Dear Mr Forbes

As you can imagine, I have given quite some thought to your letter which I received earlier today, whereby you claim I have harassed both your firm and your clients.

Please find attached copy of letter of 7 December 2022 (sic) to Mr Andrew Stewart, partner of your firm, in response to his letter of 2 December 2021, and wherein it is stated that all claims as made by myself are factual.  Indeed, documentation was provided both to you personally and also to your colleagues, with such providing proof of the veracity of every claim as made by myself.

Despite the documentary evidence provided to both you and your colleagues, Andrew Stewart wrote to me three further times stating that claims as made by myself were ‘false, malicious and highly defamatory’, while knowing full well his claims were without merit and were indeed mendacious.  Further, Mr Stewart claimed that the several Court documents I provided to you and your firm were mere ‘assertions’ on my part.

It is clear that you and your firm sought to silence me in relation to your conduct and the conduct of your clients.  We must not forget that you too wrote to me in February 2017 while taking instructions from Pauline Wright, then President of the Law Society of NSW, also stating that your client sought to commence Court proceedings against me due to my making the factual claims of a cover up taking place from within the Law Society of NSW.

Let us come back to my letter to Andrew Stewart of 7 December 2021.  Mr Stewart claims in his letter of 2 December 2021 that my ‘false’ claims give rise to the imputations that there is corrupt activity taking place within the Law Society of NSW.  As stated in my letter of 7 December 2021, given all claims as made by myself are factual and sound, it therefore follows that the ‘imputations’ that arise are true also, and, yet, your firm does nothing to remedy the matter.

It is a simple statement of fact that Baker McKenzie has gone out of its way to cover up the criminal conduct of Terence Goldberg of Turner Freeman Lawyers, while attempting to protect the Law Society and its mishandling of the complaints as made to it; while at the same time attempting to harass and intimidate by a large number of methods those attempting to make such publicly known.  It is quite obvious that I am not the one carrying out the harassment in this scenario.

Please provide to me without any delay on your part, all instances, with evidence of same, where I have harassed any member of staff at Baker McKenzie or any member of staff of the Law Society of NSW.

I look forward to your prompt response.

Yours faithfully




Tuesday, 19th July 2022


Mr Paul Forbes
Partner
Baker McKenzie
Tower One – International Towers Sydney
Level 46, 100 Barangaroo Avenue
Barangaroo   NSW   2000


Dear Mr Forbes

Re:  Law Society of NSW – covering up of criminal conduct

I refer to your letter of 12th July 2022 and my two E-mail responses to such of that same date.  Despite my request for clarity or proof of the assertions made, you have provided neither comment nor response.

For terms of reference let us firstly go to the crux of this matter.  On 23rd June 2010, Terence Goldberg of Turner Freeman Lawyers filed an Application for Assessment of Solicitor/Client Costs with the Supreme Court of NSW.  In his application to the Court, Mr Goldberg improperly and fraudulently states that he acted for the four plaintiffs together with the sixth defendant in Supreme Court proceedings as heard on 27th November 2009.  As you and your clients well know, Mr Goldberg acted for the four plaintiffs only in such.

Both you and your clients are further aware that Terence Goldberg having fraudulently obtained a judgment debt against the party who was not his client, and in concert with another, clandestinely created two entities in the guise of charities to siphon into all further monies as owned by that same party for whom he did not act (as well as placing other monies of an unknown origin into one of those entities).

Coming back to your letter of 12th July 2022, wherein you state you act for the Law Society of NSW.  In such letter, you claim that both your firm and your client are harassed by my writing to you, and it, in relation to the above.  You also claim that your client has legitimate concerns regarding my making public of the above.

However, and as is your way, you decline to provide any evidence of the said harassment and you decline to provide your client’s legitimate concerns.  Sadly, I am well used to these tactics.

As you are aware, I wrote to Ms Radhika Withana of counsel on 8th April 2019 regarding not only Mr Goldberg’s unlawful activities, but also the covering up of such by (both your client and) the Office of the Legal Services Commissioner.  I attach a copy of that letter*.

Now, as you know, such letter to Ms Withana is calm, detailed, and factual, however, some mere weeks later, John McKenzie, the Legal Services Commissioner, in an act of apparent retaliation and while also claiming to be ‘harassed’ by my writing to him, sent two police officers to my front door carrying the instruction that I was to cease writing regarding the above, or if I were not to do so criminal proceedings would be commenced against me.  Of course, no such criminal proceedings ensued.  (I have never been the subject of any criminal proceeding.)

You know, too, of the several threats as made against me by your firm that Supreme Court proceedings would be commenced against me with no further notice to myself, and you are aware also that your firm was unable to provide me with the basis of those said proceedings, or indeed of any particular whatsoever of the many claims as made against me.

In exactly the same vein, you and your firm are now unable to provide me with the ‘legitimate concerns’ as now supposedly held by your clients.  Quite simply, there are none to provide.  Barren threats and baseless assertions it seems are normal practice and are made with a simple backward wave of a hand, and with no consequence to speak of.

In previous correspondences, your firm has variously described the contents of letters to your clients as ‘false, misleading, defamatory, and highly defamatory’ and further that the making public thereof is intended to cause ‘grave and serious harm as well as causing significant distress and hurt to feelings’ yet you and your firm are unable to substantiate one single contention as made.  Baker McKenzie’s allegations have not been made in good faith and are without merit, with such straining or even leaping beyond the bounds of credibility.

Many years ago I learned that rising to meet an aggressor was futile and in the face of aggression a calm head was required.  As you know and despite the truculence shown by the many who are attempting to cover up the criminal activities of Terence Goldberg of Turner Freeman Lawyers, I have remained steadfastly calm at all times and have never once veered from the truth or the base of the matter.  Apart from the barrage of somewhat hysterical rhetoric and general noise from parties such as yourselves, not one single person has been able to identify or refer to one single untrue statement as made by myself, and yet you have the impudence to claim that I have entered into a ‘campaign of harassment’.

It is my understanding that E-mails to your firm and to the Law Society have now been blocked.  This is a manoeuvre used solely and deliberately to prevent the dissemination of information, and has been done so as I have written to others within your law firm and the Law Society of NSW regarding the cover up that is taking place; and as above have done so calmly and factually, and without embellishment of any kind.

Let us turn our minds for a moment to the letter you wrote to me in February 2017 as instructed by Ms Pauline Wright, then President of the Law Society of NSW, with you too threatening me with Supreme Court proceedings for my making public of Terence Goldberg’s criminal activities and the Law Society’s covering up of such.  Ms Wright is now a Local Court Magistrate.  My concern at these events borders on ineffable, such is the magnitude.  The gravity of such cannot be overstated.

You were personally made aware of Mr Goldberg’s criminal activities and of both Ms Wright’s and the Law Society’s covering up of such at that precise time and despite such you continue in your campaign of intimidation and calumny while attempting to protect both the wrongdoing and the wrongdoers.  Further, and quite naturally, such contemptible and venal conduct can not and will not go unopposed.  Integrity must enter into the narrative.

It has become increasingly obvious that what we have operating within the heart of the legal profession is a cabal intent on subjugating the rule of law.  Baker McKenzie is quite evidently part of that cabal.

The putrefaction within our legal system appears to run as wide as it does deep.

Yours faithfully